人权价值与文化冲突-法搜-中国法律信息搜索网

Jane K. Cowan, Marie-Bénédicte Dembour and Richard A. Wilson, Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001,pp,11.

Sally Engle Merry, Legal Pluralism and Transnational Culture: the Ka Ho´o kolokolonui Kanaka Maoli Tribunal, Hawai´i,1993, Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspective, Edited by Richard A.Wilson,London: Pluto Press,1997,pp, 29.

Sally Engle Merry, Changing Rights, Changing Culture, Jane K. Cowan, Marie-Bénédicte Dembour and Richard A. Wilson, Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001,pp,38.

Henry J. Steiner and Philip Alston, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals,Text and Materials, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996,pp, 192.

Jack Donnelly, The Concept of Human Rights, London: Croom Helm LTD, 1985,pp, 1.

Jane K. Cowan, Marie-Bénédicte Dembour and Richard A. Wilson, Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001,pp,38.

大沼保昭：《人权、国家和文明：从普遍主义的人权观到文明相容的人权观》，生活·读书·新知三联书店2003年版，第196页。

Eva Brems, Human Rights: University and Diversity, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International,2001, pp, 25.

参见Eva Brems, Human Rights: University and Diversity, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International,2001, pp, 23.

在这个声明中， Melville Herskovits的文化相对主义观点主要为：第一，所谓的“普适的”《宣言》实际上只是涵盖西方价值。第二，人类学告诉人们，从文化角度上看价值是相对的。最后总结：《宣言》不可能在全世界有效。（参见American Anthropological Association, “Statement on Human Rights”转引自Eva Brems, Human Rights: University and Diversity, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International,2001, pp, 24.）

] 《中国的人权状况》，转引自刘楠来 P.R.比伊尔陶正华 F.范.霍夫编：《人权的普遍性和特殊性》，社会科学文献出版社，1996年版，第263页。