|
Ingram, David (1987) Habermas and the Dialectic of Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ingram, David (1990) ‘Dworkin, Habermas, and the CLS Movement on Moral Criticism in Law’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 16: 23768.
Jay, Martin (1992) ‘The Debate over Performative Contradiction’, in A. Hormeth, T. McCarthy, C. Offe and A. Wellmer (eds) Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kelly, Michael, ed. (1990a) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kelly, Michael (1990b) ‘Maclntyre, Habermas and Philosophical Ethics’, in M. Kelly (ed.) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leedes, Gary C. (1991) ‘The Discourse Ethics Alternative to Rust v. Sullivan’, University of Richmond Law Review 26: 87-143.
Luhmann, Niklas (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Luhmann, Niklas (1992) ‘Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System’, Cardozo Law Review 13:1419-41.
McCarthy, Thomas (1978) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mootz, Francis J. (1988) ‘The Ontological Basis of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model of Inquiry Based on the Work of Gadamer, Habermas, and Ricoeur’, Boston University Law Review 68: S23-617.
Mullen, T. (1986) ‘Constitutional Protection of Human Rights’, in T. Campbell, D. Goldberg, S. McLean and T. Mullen (eds) Human Rights: From Rhetoric to Reality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Murphy, W. T. (1989) ‘The Habermas Effect: Critical Theory and Academic Law’, Current Legal Problems 42: 135-65.
Northey, Rod (1988) ‘Conflicting Principles of Canadian Environmental Reform: Trubek and Habermas v. Law and Economics and the Law Reform Commission’, Dalhousie LawJournal 11: 639-62.
Pettit, Philip (1982) ‘Habermas on Truth and justice’, in G. H. R. Parkinson (ed.) Marx and Marxisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Preuss, Ulrich K. (1989) ‘Rationality Potentials of Law: Allocative, Distributive and Communicative Rationality’, in C. Joerges and D. M. Trubek (eds) Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Raes, Koen (1986) ‘Legalisation, Communication and Strategy: A Critique of Habermas’ Approach to Law’, Journal of Law and Society 13:183-206.
Rasmussen, David M. (198 8) ‘Communication Theory and the Critique of the Law: Habermas and Unger on the Law’, Praxis International 8: 155-70.
Rasmussen, David M. (1990a) Reading Habermas. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Rasmussen, David M., ed. (1990b) Universalism vs. Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
