法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
婵炲娲栫欢銉︾┍閳╁啩绱� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╁棘娴煎瓨顦� | 婵℃鐗呯欢锟� | 缂侇喗鍎抽幖褔寮崶鈺冨娇 | 闁告帗鍨崇花銊モ枖閺囩偟浼� | 婵ɑ鍨崇花銊モ枖閺囩偟浼� | 缂備礁绻戠粊鐟扳枖閺囩偟浼� | 閻炴稑鏈弬鍌氣枖閺囩偟浼� | 閻犲洤顦抽鎾斥枖閺囩偟浼� | 闁告艾鐗勯埀顑藉亾闁靛棌鍋撻柛姘炬嫹 | 婵℃鐗呯欢銉у垝妤e啠鍋撻敓锟� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╁棘閸ワ箑濮� | 闁告艾鐗嗛幃鎾绘嚑閸愨晜鎷� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉ф暜濮濆瞼妲� | 闁告瑦鐡曢埀顒€鍟撮。鑺ユ償閿燂拷 | 
婵炲娲栫欢銉╁炊閸欍儱濮� | 閻犲洤顦抽鎾诲箰閸パ冪 | 閻㈩垰鎽滈弫銈呪枖閺団槅娼� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉р偓鍦仜婵拷 | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╂煂婵犱胶鐤� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╂⒒椤斿墽鎽� | 婵炲娲濋~澶屾喆閿濆牜鍤� | 閻熶椒绀侀崹浠嬪棘閸ワ箑濮� | 閻庤浜濈涵鍓佺尵閿燂拷 | 婵ɑ鍨甸弲銏犫枖閺囩姾顫� | 閻炴稑鏈弬鍌氣枖閺囩姾顫� | 缂備礁绻戠粊鐟扳枖閺囩姾顫� | 闁告帗鍨剁涵鍓佺尵閿燂拷 | 缂佲偓閸欍儳绐楁繛澶嬫礈鐞氾拷 | 婵℃鐗呯欢銉ф惥鐎n亜鈼� | 闁靛棌鍋撻柕鍡忓亾闁靛棌鍋撻柕鍡忓亾
迈向一种法律的社会理论(第二章)



Alfred Manigk, Savigny und der Modernismus im Recht, Berlin, 1914。


Savigny, System des heutigen romischen Rechts, Berlin, 1940. 前言。


Trubek, D. M., “Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism”, Wisconsin Law Review, 1972:3, 721-753. p.722.


Radbruch, G., “Legal Philosophy”, in The Legal Philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin, 3rd edn, trans, K. Wilk, Cambridge: MA.: Harvard University Press, 1950. p.66.


参见:Ihering, R. von, Der Zweck im Recht, vol.I, 2nd edn, Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel, 1884。


参见:Turner, S. P. & Factor, R. A., Max Weber, the Lawyer as Social Thinker, London and New York: Routledge, 1994. p.1。


参见:Ihering, R. von, Der Geist des romischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwickung, bd.1, Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel, 1852.


参见:Kelly, R. F.的“Historical and Political Interpretations of Jurisprudence and the Social Action Perspective in Sociology”,这是一篇在1977年于芝加哥举行的美国社会学协会第72届年会社会学史小组讨论会上宣读的论文。


Ihering, R. von, Law as a Means to an End, vol.I, 4th edn, trans. by Husik, New York: Macmillan, 1913. liv.


Ihering, R. von, Law as a Means to an End, vol.I, 4th edn, trans. by Husik, New York: Macmillan, 1913. p.28.


同上,p.34, pp.176-7。


同上,pp.106-7。


Max Weber, Gesammelte Aufsatze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 3rd edn, Tubingen, 1968. p.202.


参见:Max Weber, ——, The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989. p.124。


见:黄俊杰编译:《史学方法论丛》,台北:学生书局1981年版。第128页。


参见马克斯·韦伯1904年发表的“社会科学与社会政策中的‘客观性’”,见:Max Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, translated by A. Shils and Henry A. Finch, Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1949。


Jellinek, G., Allgemeine Staatslehre, 3rd edn, expanded by W. Jellinek, Berlin: O. Haring, 1914. first edition published in 1900.


见上书,p.36。


同上,p.39。


参见:Albrow, Martin, Max Weber’s Construction of Social Theory, Basingstoke and London: Macmillan Education Ltd., 1990. p.211。


Max Weber: Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Guenther Roth & Claus Wittich ed., University of California Press, 1978 (second printing). V.I. p.11.


Max Weber: Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Guenther Roth & Claus Wittich ed., University of California Press, 1978 (second printing). V.I. p.11.


参见:Turner, S. P. & Factor, R. A., Max Weber, the Lawyer as Social Thinker, London and New York: Routledge, 1994. pp.126-135。


参见:Treiber, H., ‘“Elective Affinities” between Weber’s Sociology of Religion and Sociology of Law’, Theory and Society, 1985, vol.14, pp.809-861。


参见:Rheinstein, M., “Introduction”, in Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, edited and annotated by Max Rheinstein, translated by Edwards Shils and Max Rheinstein, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1967.


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 页 共[10]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章




婵炲娲栫欢銉︾┍閳╁啩绱� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╁棘娴煎瓨顦� | 婵℃鐗呯欢锟� | 缂侇喗鍎抽幖褔寮崶鈺冨娇 | 闁告帗鍨崇花銊モ枖閺囩偟浼� | 婵ɑ鍨崇花銊モ枖閺囩偟浼� | 缂備礁绻戠粊鐟扳枖閺囩偟浼� | 閻炴稑鏈弬鍌氣枖閺囩偟浼� | 閻犲洤顦抽鎾斥枖閺囩偟浼� | 闁告艾鐗嗛幃锟� | 婵℃鐗呯欢銉у垝妤e啠鍋撻敓锟� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╁棘閸ワ箑濮� | 闁告艾鐗嗛幃鎾绘嚑閸愨晜鎷� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉ф暜濮濆瞼妲� | 
婵炲娲栫欢銉╁炊閸欍儱濮� | 閻犲洤顦抽鎾诲箰閸パ冪 | 閻㈩垰鎽滈弫銈呪枖閺団槅娼� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉р偓鍦仜婵拷 | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╂煂婵犱胶鐤� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╂⒒椤斿墽鎽� | 婵炲娲濋~澶屾喆閿濆牜鍤� | 閻熶椒绀侀崹浠嬪棘閸ワ箑濮� | 閻庤浜濈涵鍓佺尵閿燂拷 | 婵ɑ鍨甸弲銏犫枖閺囩姾顫� | 閻炴稑鏈弬鍌氣枖閺囩姾顫� | 缂備礁绻戠粊鐟扳枖閺囩姾顫� | 闁告帗鍨剁涵鍓佺尵閿燂拷 | 缂佲偓閸欍儳绐楁繛澶嬫礈鐞氾拷 | 闁靛棌鍋撻柕鍡忓亾闁靛棌鍋撻柕鍡忓亾