|
At the end, “the Commission is satisfied that the proposed acquisition would not have, nor would be likely to have, the effect of substantially lessening competition in New Zealand in the defined markets.”
VI. CONCLUSION
Viewed of these acts related to competition in different countries, they have the related provisions to face the merger. However, the ‘final’ shape of the regulatory policy has not shown, apparently, because the telecommunications industry changed remarkably in the digital age.
Whether the merger of the network distribution industry with the equipment industry is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ thing, it seems likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
【参考文献】BIBLIOGHRAPHY
Legislation:
The Broadcasting Service Act 1992 (Australia), Section 93, 94, 96
The Telecommunications Act 2001 New Zealand
Textbook:
S. Frankel and G. McLay Intellectual Property in New Zealand 1st Ed., Butterworth, Wellington, Chapter IV
Decision:
No 479 Vodafone Mobile Ltd (NZ) & 900 MHz Spectrum, 1 November 2002
Article:
Dr M. Pickford Economics and the Commerce Act-Business Issues Information in New Zealand Competition Law-Compliance, 1997
P. G. Leonard and R. Pascoe Australian Telecommunications Regulatory Framework: Part III Sweet and Maxwell Ltd &Contributors, C.T.L.R. 2002, 8(7), 185-191
S. Liston OFCOM-the Perfect Dish or a Recipe for Disaster in Entertainment Law Review, Ent. L. R. 2003, 14(2), 19-23
R. Kariyawasam Internet Interconnection: Where Are We Going? in Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2000
S. Weinstein the Medium is the Message: the Legal and Policy Implications of the Creation of OFCOM in the Age of Convergence in Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2003
T. Crane 3G Mobile: Will the Biggest Telecoms Gamble of All Succeed in Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2001
S. Perlmutter Convergence and the Future of Copyright in European Intellectual Property Review, 2001
|
