法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
濞夋洖绶ユ穱鈩冧紖 | 濞夋洖绶ラ弬浼存 | 濡楀牅绶� | 缁儳鎼ч弬鍥╃彿 | 閸掓垳绨ㄥ▔鏇炵伐 | 濮樻垳绨ㄥ▔鏇炵伐 | 缂佸繑绁瑰▔鏇炵伐 | 鐞涘本鏂傚▔鏇炵伐 | 鐠囧顔撳▔鏇炵伐 | 閸氬牄鈧偓閵嗏偓閸氾拷 | 濡楀牅绶ョ划楣冣偓锟� | 濞夋洖绶ラ弬鍥﹀姛 | 閸氬牆鎮撻懠鍐╂拱 | 濞夋洖绶ョ敮姝岀槕 | 閸欐瓕鈧啴顣芥惔锟� | 
濞夋洖绶ラ崶鍙ュ姛 | 鐠囧顔撻幐鍥у础 | 鐢摜鏁ゅ▔鏇☆潐 | 濞夋洖绶ョ€圭偛濮� | 濞夋洖绶ラ柌濠佺疅 | 濞夋洖绶ラ梻顔剧摕 | 濞夋洝顫夌憴锝堫嚢 | 鐟佷礁鍨介弬鍥﹀姛 | 鐎诡亝纭剁猾锟� | 濮樻垵鏅㈠▔鏇犺 | 鐞涘本鏂傚▔鏇犺 | 缂佸繑绁瑰▔鏇犺 | 閸掓垶纭剁猾锟� | 缁€鍙ョ窗濞夋洜琚� | 濡楀牅绶ョ搾瀣◢ | 閵嗏偓閵嗏偓閵嗏偓閵嗏偓
合并时代的竞争:各国电信、多媒体法之比较

  ● required to market and offer AOL''s digital subscriber line (DSL) services to subscribers in Time Warner cable areas where affiliated cable broadband service is available in the same manner and at the same retail pricing as they do in those areas where affiliated cable broadband ISP service is not available.”
  C. the Fate of the AOL Time Warner
  After the merger, AOL Time Warner has not been ‘prosperity’ as imagining. On April 2002, AOL Time Warner took a $54 billion (USD) quarterly loss—the biggest quarterly loss in US history. On 30 January 2003, AOL Time Warner announced that it reported a $45.5 billion quarterly loss to account for the declining value of its AOL property (an annual loss of nearly $100 billion (USD)—the largest annual loss ever in corporate history).
  “AOL” was voted to remove from AOL Time Warner corporate name by its board of directors. On 19 September 2003, AOL Time Warner CEO Richard Parsons said: “We believe that our new name better reflects the portfolio of our valuable businesses and ends any confusion between our corporate name and the America Online brand name for our investors, partners and the public” in a press statement.
  It is really in doubt where the AOL Time Warner—the largest media company in history will go to.
  III. TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1996 (US) AND FCC
  The Proposed Order just is effective for a term of five years. In legislation, Telecommunication Act 1996 (1996 Act) provided some provisions about competition which covers three domains of communications: local and long-distance telecommunications services, broadcasting, and cable and video services. The FCC also has a power to reduce the monopoly and creating efficiently a fair competitive and open market in telecommunications. As following this paper will issue about the roles of FCC and the 1996 Act in some individual cases.
  A. AT&T
  AT&T is the largest cable TV company in US. Concerned the cases of AT&T v Lowa Utilities Board and AT&T/TCI v City of Portland, what kind of roles do the FCC and the 1996 Act play?


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 页 共[10]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章




娉曞緥淇℃伅 | 娉曞緥鏂伴椈 | 妗堜緥 | 绮惧搧鏂囩珷 | 鍒戜簨娉曞緥 | 姘戜簨娉曞緥 | 缁忔祹娉曞緥 | 琛屾斂娉曞緥 | 璇夎娉曞緥 | 鍚堝悓 | 妗堜緥绮鹃€� | 娉曞緥鏂囦功 | 鍚堝悓鑼冩湰 | 娉曞緥甯歌瘑 | 
娉曞緥鍥句功 | 璇夎鎸囧崡 | 甯哥敤娉曡 | 娉曞緥瀹炲姟 | 娉曞緥閲婁箟 | 娉曞緥闂瓟 | 娉曡瑙h | 瑁佸垽鏂囦功 | 瀹硶绫� | 姘戝晢娉曠被 | 琛屾斂娉曠被 | 缁忔祹娉曠被 | 鍒戞硶绫� | 绀句細娉曠被 | 銆€銆€銆€銆€