综上所述，我国目前不宜采用不方便法院原则。
【作者简介】
徐伟功，中南财经政法大学副教授。
【注释】
奚晓明《不方便法院制度的几点思考》，载《法学研究》2002年第1期。
J.J.Fawcett,Declining J urisdiction in Private International Law, Oxfor d: Clarendon Press , 1995 ,p. 10.
袁泉《不方便法院原则三题》，载《中国法学》2003年第6期。
P.R. Beaumoant , A United Kingdom Perspective on the Proposed Hague J udgments Convention , 24 Brooklyn J IL(1998) , p. 82.
J.J . Fawcett , Declining J urisdiction in Private International Law , Oxford :Clarendon Press ,1995 , p. 431.
W.Tetley ,Mixed J urisdiction : Common Law v. Civil Law , Louisiana Law Review ,Spring 2000.
T. Matswo ,J urisdiction in Transnational Cases in Japan , 23 International Lawyer ,1989.
徐伟功《不方便法院原则研究》，吉林人民出版社2002年版，第286—294页。
E.Suarez，Stangvikv.ShielfandForumNonConveniensAnalysis：Doesa Fear Too Much Justice Really Close California Courtrooms to Foreign Plaintiffs?Transnational Lawyer，Spring，2000，pp.189-190.
E. Suarez , Stangvik v. Shielf and Forum Non Conveniens Analysis : Does a Fear Too Much J ustice Really Close CaliforniaCourtrooms to Foreign Plaintiffs ? Transnational Lawyer , Spring , 2000 , pp. 189 - 190.
P. Blair , The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in Anglo - American Law , 29 Colum. L. Rev. 1 , 1929.
Reed , To Be or Not To Be : The Forum Non Conveniens Performance Acted Out On Anglo - American CourtroomStages , George Journal of International and Comparative Law , 2001.
Robertson ,The Federal Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens“: An Object Lesson in Uncontrolled Doctrine”,29 Tex , Int’L.J . ,1994.
Robertson , Forum Non Conveniens in American and England :“A Rather Fantastic Fiction”, The Law Quarterly Review ,103 , 1987 July.
徐伟功《不方便法院原则在中国的运用》，载《政法论坛》2003年第2期。
