由此可见，程序正义在现代语境下已失去昔日风采，沦落为”目的支配地位“理论之下的主观参照物。这一变化是社会整体利益驱使，也是文化多元的必然结果，是对法治的检讨。当然，在还没有建立和健全法治的国家，特别是正在迈向法治的我国，程序正义基本理念还亟待落实和完善。我国面临的不是检讨程序正义，那是人家实行法治数百年后面临的课题，我们面临的正是他们曾经面临过的法治原则的如何实现。
【作者简介】
管宇，中国社科院法学所博士后研究人员。
【注释】No Freeman shall be taken and imprisoned or disseised of any tenement or of his liberties or free cutoms……except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land．
参见陈瑞华：《程序正义论》载于北大信息网。
参见《程序正义的哲学基础》so100．CN2005—2008．
No one should be condemned except in due manner，or by process made by writ origlnal at the common law．
That no man of what estate or condtition that he be，shall be put out of land or tenement，nor taken，nor imprisoned……without beingbrought in answer by due process of law．28 Edw．ⅢCh．3（1354）．
W．Blackstone，Commentaries on the Laws of England（9th ed．，London 01783，p．279．
参见徐亚文：《程序正义论》，山东人民出版社2004年3月版，第4页。
Foil v．Italy，Judgment of 10 December 1982，Series A，No．56；（1983）5：EHRR 313。
See Manfred Nowak，U．N Convention on Civil and Political Rights Commentary，by N．P．Engel，Publisher，Kehl arn Rhein，Strasbourg．Arlington，Va 1993，P．236．
Sir Maurice S．Amos，“A day in court at home and abroad，”Cambridge Law Journal 2（1926）．
参见许兰亭著《论我国律师在场权构建》载于中国刑辩网。
Hart，supua，n．70，at 132．
L．Full，The law in quest of Itself（Northwesterrn U．Press，1940）．
Stromberg v．California，283 U．S．359—376（1931），360—369．
Powell v．Alabama，287 U．U．45—77（1932），49—73．以上内容参见王希：《原则与妥协》，北京大学出版社2000年版，第363页。
Allgeyer v．State of Louisianna，165 U．S．578（1897）．
参见陈贵民《英美的程序法思想及其价值》载于中国诉讼法律网。
In the detemination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him，everyone is estitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law．
See twinning supra note 25 at 225（1973）．
Jerome Frank，“Mr．Justice Holmes and Non—Euclidian Legal Thinking，”Cornell Law Quarterly 17（1932）：568 586．J．W．
Roscoe Pound，Juriprudence（St．Paul，Minn．：West Publishing，1959），1，350．
Sanford H·kadish，“Methodology and criteria in Due Process Adjudication—A Survey and Criticism，”Yale Law Journal 66（1975）：319．
County of Sacramento v．Lewis，118S．Ct．1708，1716一1717（1998）。
