So the problem of the ownership of added money should be discussed. The history of money is thousands of years and the history of paper money is hundreds of years at least, but the study on the ownership of incremental printed paper money is blank in theories and laws by now. It''s the shame of economists, jurists, legislatures and the whole of mankind. It''s also the shame of Liu Dasheng, because Liu Dasheng has studied on law for 32 years.
II, The Ownership of Incremental Printed Paper Money Shouldn''t Belong to Governments or Banks
Why should governments or banks not own the ownership of incremental printed paper money? Because:
First, governments and banks invest little.
The social wealth have been increasing more and more, and the money-demand quantity have been increasing more and more, but gold mines and silver mines have been getting fewer and fewer. People can''t use gold and silver to coin money forever. So all the countries have been using pure paper money which is not Yuandatou or the the silver certificates printed by Rishengchang since the Second World War. The time of gold certificates, silver certificates, gold standard and so on is over. Governments and banks spend little in printing paper money. According to Baidupedia, "The material expense and cost of labor America spend in printing a piece of paper money which value is $1 is only $0.03."[3] So I infer the cost of a piece of paper money which value is $100 is $0.05, because the weight of a piece of paper money which value is $100 is equal to about two pieces of paper money which value is $1 per piece and the amounts of the procedures of printing a piece of paper money which value is $100 is equal to half the amounts of the procedures of printing two pieces of paper money which value is $1 per piece. The value of the paper money is $100, but the cost is $0.05, the abnormal profit belongs to governments and banks, it''s not reasonable.
