考虑到我国体育体制的现实情况，转型期的中国体育管理者也要顺应国际潮流，在制定体育运动规则和做出体育处罚裁决时，要充分考虑到运动员和教练员的权益，毕竟他们才是体育运动的最基本主体。除了要建立独立的体育仲裁机构外，还应当允许法院对其进行司法监督。为此，体育组织要修改其规则，除了要建立和完善程序公正的内部争议解决机制外，在有关规则或者裁决严重侵犯运动员劳动权的情况下，还应当允许外部独立的体育仲裁机构或者法院介入有关争议。唯有如此，才能真正做到切实维护运动员的基本劳动权，更好地促进我国体育运动的健康发展。
【作者简介】
黄世席，单位为山东大学法学院。
【参考文献】[1] Chambers v. British Olympic Ass''n, [2008] EWHC 2028 (Q.B.) (U.K.)
[2] Coaches Report, Restraint of Trade: Breathing New Life into an Old Legal Doctrine [EB/OL]. http://www.sportlaw.ca/articles/general_restraintoftrade.php, 2009/5/12.
[3] Simon Gardiner et al. Sports Law (3rd ed.)[M], London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd., 2006: 214.
[4] Johnson v. Athletics Canada 114 O.A.C. 338 (1998) (CA (Ont)).
[5] Peter Charlish. Dwain Chambers Runs out of Time [J]. 10 Tex. Rev. Ent. & Sports L., 2008, 10(1): 66.
[6] Michael S. Straubel. Doping Due Process: A Critique of the Doping Control Process in International Sport [J]. Dickinson Law Review, 2002, 106(3): 546.
[7] Dionner L. Koller. How the United States Government Sacrifices Athletes’ Constitutional Rights in the Pursuit of National Prestige [EB/OL], http://lawreview.byu.edu/archives/2008/5/4Koller.FIN.pdf., 2010/5/5.
[8] Paulo David. Human Rights in Youth Sport: A Critical Review of Children’s Rights in Competitive Sports[M]. Londer and New York: Routledge, 2005: 129.
[9] Eastham v. Newcastle United Football Club Limited (1964) Ch. 413.
[10] Waston v. Prager, [1991] 3 All E. R. 487.
[11] Wilander v. Tobin, [1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 195.
[12] Edwards v British Athletic Federation [1998] 2 C.M.L.R. 363 (Ch D).
[13] Ian Blackshaw. Dwain Chambers loses High Court challenge to overturn his lifetime Olympics ban[EB/OL]. http: www.sportslaw.nl, 2008/9/15.
[14] Johnson v. Athletics Canada, [1997] Ontario Court (General Division) No. 3201.
[15] Aaron N. Wise and Bruce S. Meyer. International Sports Law and Business (Vol.2)[M]. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997: 1195.
[16] Antonio Buti and Saul Fridman. Drugs, Sport and the Law [M]. Australia: Scribblers Publishing, 2001: 128.
