法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
论网络消费者保护的国际私法方法

【作者简介】
刘益灯,中南大学法学院教授,荷兰莱顿大学法学院博士后。

【注释】See Campbell& PeterNygh,Transnational Tort Litigation:Jurisdictional Principles,Clarendon Press,1996,p. 75.
See J. H. C. Morris,The Conflict of Laws,4th ed.,West Educational Publishing,1993,pp. 438-465.
UCITA§110 cmt. 3.
Ronald de Bruin,Consumer Trust in Electronic Commeerce:Time for Best Practice,Geborente Nieuw Lekkerland International onder ISBN. 2002,pp. 197-199.
See Johnson& Post,Law and Borders:The Rise ofLaw in Cyberspace,http:www. cl.i orgX0025 LBFIN. html.
See Catherine Kessedjan,Electronic Data Interchange:Internet and Electronic Commerce,Preliminary Document Press,2000,p. 263.
参见黄进主编:《国际私法》,法律出版社2005年版,第432页。
参见肖永平:《国际私法原理》,法律出版社2007年第2版,第262页以下。
Supra,Ronald de Bruin,p. 309.
Supra,J. H. C. Morris,pp. 279-280.
See Jonathan Rosenoer,Cyberlaw:the Law of Internet,SpringerPublishing,1996,p234.
Supra,Ronald de Bruin,p. 325.
See the EU Directive on Electronic Signatures,Directive 199993EC O. J. LB 19. 1. 2000. Art 7 (1) provides:Member States shall ensure that certificateswhich are issued as qualified certificates to the public by a certification-service-provider established in a third country are recognized as legally equivalent to certificates by a certification-service-provider established within thecommunity if…(c) the certificate or the certification -service- provider is recognized under a bilateral ormultilateral agreement between the community and third countries or international organizations.
See Council Directive on Certain LegalAspects of Information Society Services,in Particular Electronic Commerce,in the Internet Market,200031EC,art. 3(3) & Annex,Recital23,2000. O. J. (L178). Arts 3 and 4.
前注,黄进主编书,第437页。
1980 Roma Convention:The Convention on theApplicable Law ofContractualObligation (1980).
See Keller’s proposal (pp. 185-6) not to limit the parties,“freedom of choice”,but to give consumer the right always to invoke the protective provisions of the Law ofhis habitual residence.
参见刘益灯:《从形式正义到实质正义:消费者合同法功能的法哲学分析》,载《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2004年第6期。
See Keller’s proposal (pp. 185-6) not to limit the parties,“freedom of choice”,but to give consumer the right always to invoke the protective provisions of the Law ofhis habitual residence.
See Malaria La Protection du consommateur en droit interatiorelprive. Travaux de I’AssociationHenriCapitant23(1973),p. 389.
Recommendation of the Council concerningGuidelines for consumer protection in the coster of electronic commerce,Paris:OECD 9 December1999. Internet inference,http:www. oecd. orgdstistiitconsumerprodguidelines. htm.
146 F. 3d 1348,1354 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
Loucks v. Standard OilCo.,224 N. Y. 99,111,120,N. E. 198,202 (1918).
参见肖永平:《中国冲突法立法问题研究》,武汉大学出版社1996年版,第194页以下。
Dillon,Laws and Jurisprudence ofEngland and America,Harvard Law Review,1997,(5):731-733.


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] 页 共[8]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章