法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
欧盟民法典草案之物权法评论

  
  五、展望

  
  在过去二十多年间,欧盟私法的统一成为学界最热衷讨论的话题之一。统一民法典的出台成为多数学者的梦想。然而,由于合同法与商业交易的更紧密联系,欧盟私法的统一更多集中于合同法的融合之上。而对物权法的统一则体现于三项指令及一项规则当中。可见,相比于合同法而言,物权法的统一如同沧海一粟。但是由于欧盟内部市场经济发展的需要,欧盟私法的广泛统一成为当前的必然趋势。物权作为传统民法体系中最重要的权利之一,成为私法的一个重要组成部分。经济的发展与私法的广泛统一客观上要求欧盟对物权法的融合。

  
  近年来,人的基本权利的保护一直成为现代私法发展的主要方向之一,财产权作为人与生俱来的一项权利,应当得到充分的保障。在这样的背景下,欧盟民法典草案突破了《欧共体条约》不损害各成员国财产体系的阻碍,将物权法的统一纳入到草案的范围之内。可以说该草案是一部较为先进的民法典草案。其中的物权法编充分的体现了欧盟各成员国物权法体系的共同原则,如信息公开原则、物权法定原则的重述;同时草案也融入了现代物权法的最新发展成果,如信托法的统一等等。可以说,该物权法编是一部较为先进的物权法草案,体现了现代私法的发展方向。然而,由于欧盟在私法的统一上并不能损害各成员国的公共政策,且应当充分尊重各国多元的法律文化等因素,该草案对物权法的统一仍然非常有限。这就注定了草案并不能够满足未来欧盟经济发展的需求。值得重复的是,欧盟民法典草案虽然提交至欧盟委员会,但是最后是否会被采纳、以何种形式赋予其效力等等问题,我们仍需拭目以待!

【作者简介】
付俊伟,北京理工大学法学院教师。 Jan Smits,荷兰马斯特里赫特大学法学院教授。
【注释】 Ugo Mattei & Andrea Pradi, Property rights: a comparative law and economics perspective in the global era, Donatella Porrini & Giovanni Battista Ramello, Property Rights Dynamics: A law and economics perspective, Routledge publisher, 2007, pp. 41-45.
Martijn W. Hesselink, The Politics of a European Civil Code, Kluwer Law International, 2006, pp. 3-5.
Ewoud Hondius, European Private Law- Survey 2000-2002, European Review of Private Law, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 865-871.
Horst Eidenmuller, Florian Faust, Hans Christoph Grigoleit, Nils Jansen, Gerhard Wagner, Reinhard Zimmermann, The Common Frame of References for European Private Law: Policy Choices and Codification Problems, Modern Law Review, vol. 71, 2008, pp. 505-508.
K.Lenaerts & K. Gutman, Federal Common Law in European Union: A Comparative Perspective from the United States, American Journal of Comparative Law, 2006, pp. 56-59/
Council Directive 93/7/EEC of 15 March 2993 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State.
Bram Akkermans, The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law, Intersentia, 2008, pp. 501-502.
Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on Combating Late Payment in Commercial Transactions.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings.
Bram Akkermans, The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law, Intersentia, 2008, p. 501.
Directive 2002/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2002 on Financial Collateral Arrangements.
Bram Akkermans, The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law, Intersentia, 2008, p. 501.
U. Drobnig & H.J.Snijders & E.J.Zippro, Divergences of Property Law: an obstacle to the internal market, Munich: Sellier, 2006, pp. 13-18.
Gerard McCormack, The CFR and Credit Securities – A Suitable Case for Treatment, Antoni Vaquer, European Private Law Beyond the Common Frame of Reference, Europa Law Publishing, 2008, 99-105.
The Integration of the EU Mortgage Credit Markets, Report by the Forum Group on Mortgage Credit, 2004.
The European Commission’s Green Paper on Mortgage Credit in the EU Eurosystem Contribution to the Public Consultation (COM (2005) 327), 1 December 2005.
Mortgage Credit Forum Group, Green paper on Mortgage Credit in the EU (COM/2005/0327 final).
European Agreement on a Voluntary Code Conduct on Pre-contractual Information for Home Loans.
Stefan Gustafsson & Agnieszka Drewniak, EULIS-Cross Border Land Information in Europe, 2008, pp. 2-4.
Sjef van Erp, Comparative Property Law, Mathias Reimann & Reinhard Zimmermann, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 1046.
European Parliament Resolution with Recommendations to the Commission on Succession and Wills (2005/2148), Recommendation 9.
“to promote economic and social progress which is balanced and sustainable, in particular through the creation of an area without internal frontiers, through the strengthening of economic and social cohesion and through the establishment of economic and monetary union, ultimately including a single currency in accordance with the provisions of this treaty”, Article B, Treaty on European Union, 29 July, 1992.
Manfred E. Streit & Werner Mussler, The economic constitution of the European Community: From Rome to Maastricht, Constitutional Political Economy, vol. 5, 1994, pp. 319-353.
Sjef Van Erp, J.H.M. van Erp, European and national property law: osmosis or growing antagonism?, Europa Law Publishing, 2006, 1-3.
Ulrich Drobnig, Henk J. Snijders, Erik-Jan Zippro, Divergences of Property Law, an Obstacle to the Internal Market?, European Law Publishers, 2006, pp. 3-5.
Ugo Mattei, Basic principles of property law: a comparative legal and economic introduction, Greenwood Publishing, 2000, pp. 1-15.
Donatella Porrini & Giovanni B. Ramello, Property rights dynamics: current issues in law and economics, Donatella Porrini & Giovanni Battista Ramello, Property Rights Dynamics: A Law and Economics Perspective, Routledge, 2007, p. 3-4.
M.J.Bailey, Property Rights in Aboriginal Societies, P. Newman, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Eonomics and the Law, London: Macmillan, 1998, pp. 155-157.
Wurzburg Oliver Remien, Real Property law and European private law: A sketch of an unsurveyed territory, Paper presented at the European Private Law Forum, 2004, pp. 2-4.
Duncan Kennedy, Thoughts on Coherent, Social Values and National Tradition in Private Law, Martijn W. Hesselink, The Politics of a European Civil Code, Kluwer Law International, 2006, pp. 9-10.
Jan Smits, The Making of European Private Law: Toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a Mixed Legal System, Intersentia, 2002, p. 245.
Andrzej Rapaczynski, The Roles of the State and the Market in Establishing Property Rights, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 10, 1996, pp. 87-93.
Gerrit Meijer, Sjoerd Y. Th. Meijer, Influence of the Code Civil in the Netherlands, European Journal of Law and Econmics, 2002, pp. 231-234.
Christian von Bar, Ulrich Drobnig, The Interaction of Contract Law and Tort and Property Law in Europe: A Comparative Study, European Law Publishers, 2004, pp. 320-322.
Isabel Gonzalez Pacano a & Carlos Diez Soto, Contract and transfer of property, Antoni Vaquer, European Private Law Beyond the Common Frame of Reference: Essays in Honour of Reinhard Zimmermann, Europa Law Publishing, 2008, pp. 183-186.
Article 1, First Protocol, European Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1952.
Olha O. Cherednychenko, Fundamental Rights, Contract Law and the Protection of the Weaker Party: A Comparative Analysis of the Constitutionalisation of Contract Law, with Emphasis on Risky Financial Transactions, European Law Publishers, 2007, pp. 27-31.
The Fifth Amendment to the 1787 United States Constitution.
Article 17, Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 1789.
Camilo Basilio Schutte, The European Fundamental Right of Property: Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights: Its Origins, Its Workings, and Its Impact on the National Legal Orders, Kluwer Law International., 2004, p. 13.
Olha O. Cherednychenko, Fundamental Rights, Contract Law and the Protection of the Weaker Party: A Comparative Analysis of the Constitutionalisation of Contract Law, with Emphasis on Risky Financial Transactions, European Law Publishers, 2007, pp. 23-26.
Ugo Mattei, Comparative Law and Economics, University of Michigan Press, 1997, pp. 201-204.
Eric Clive, The Principles of European Law and Draft European Civil Code: Some Observations on Drafting, Santiago Espiau, Bases of a European Contract Law, Tirant lo Blanch, 2003, pp. 543-576.
Armin von Bogdandy, Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, Arnim von Bogdandy, Petros C. Mavroidis, Yves Meny, European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, Kluwer Law International, 2002, p.456.
C.B.Schutte, The European Fundamental Right of Property, Kluwer, 2004, pp. 25-27.
Sjef van Erp, Comparative Property Law, Mathias Reimann & Zimmermann, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp.1044-1045.
Gianmaria Ajani, Transformation of Systems in Middle and Eastern Europe and its Consequences for Banks, StockExchanges and Security Rights, Paper presented to Max-Planck Institut Symposium, 1996, pp. 1-6.
Christian von Bar & Ulrich Drobnig, The Interaction of Contract Law and Tort and Property Law in Europe: A Comparative Study, European Law Publishers, 2004, pp. 317-319.
Id.
Id.
Isabel Gonzalez Pacanowska, Carlos Diez Soto, Contract and Transfer of Property, Antoni Vaquer, European Private Law Beyond the Common Frame of Reference: Essays in Honour of Reinhard Zimmermann, Europa Law Publishing, 2008, pp. 183-194.
Id.
Stefano Rodota, The Civil Code within the European ‘Constitutional Process’, Martijn Hesselink, The Politics of a European Civil Code, pp. 115-124.
J.Gordon Halton, Davdi L. Callies, Daniel R. Mandelker, Paula A. Franzese, Property Law and the Public Interest: Cases and Materials, LexisNexis, 2003, pp. 23-42.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, A More Coherent European Contract Law, An Action Plan, COM (2003), 68 final, p. 4-5.
Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) Interim Outline Edition, european law publishers, 2008, p. 5.
Id.
Thomas W. Merrill, Henry E. Smith, Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle, The Yale Law Journal, October 2000, pp. 3-5.
H. Patrick Glenn, Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 359-360.
Id.
Id.
Michael J. Trebilcock, The Limits of Freedom of Contract, Harvard University Press, 1993, p. 8.
Peter G.Stillman, Szasz on Contract, Liberty and Autonomy, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 42, 1983, p. 94.
DCFR, p. 48.
DCFR, p. 55.
Simon Whittaker & Reinhard Zimmermann, Good faith in European contract law: surveying the legal landscape, Reinhard Zimmermann & Simon Whittaker, Good Faith in European Contract Law, Cambridge University Press, 2000, p.16.
Reinhard Zimmerman, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 778-788.
Martin Josef chermaier, Bona Fides in Roman Contract Law, Reinhard Zimmermann & Simon Whittaker, Good Faith in European Contract Law, Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 71-77.
Cicero, De officiis 3, 70.
Guis, Institutiones 4, 62.
Denis Tallon, Introduction, Hugh Beale, Arthur Hartkamp, Hein Kotz, Denis Tallon, Casebooks on the Common Law of Europe: Contract Law, Hart Publishing, 2002,pp. 88.
Martijn Willem Hesselink, G.J.P. de Vries, Principles of European Contract Law, Kluwer, 2001, p. 54.
Ulrich Drobnig, Transfer of Property, Arthur Hartkamp, Martijn Hesselink, Ewoud Hondius, Carla Joustra, Edgar du Perron, Muriel Veldman, Towards a European Civil Code, 2004, Kluwer Law International, p. 739.
Michel Grimaldi & Francois Barriere, Trust and Fiducie, Arthur Hartkamp, Martijn Hesselink, Ewoud Hondius, Carla Joustra, Edgar du Perron, Muriel Veldman, Towards a European Civil Code, 2004, Kluwer Law International, pp. 787-788.
W.W. Buckland, Equity in Roman Law, University of London Press, 1911, pp. 14-15.
Elizabeth Cooke, Modern Studies in Property Law, Hart Publishing, 2003, pp. 43-45.
E. Edwards & N. Stockwell, Trusts and Equity, Pitman Publishing, 2002, p. 79.
Michel Grimaldi & Francois Barriere, Trust and Fiducie, Arthur Hartkamp, Martijn Hesselink, Ewoud Hondius, Carla Joustra, Edgar du Perron, Muriel Veldman, Towards a European Civil Code, 2004, Kluwer Law International, p. 790.
Ugo Mattei, Comparative Law and Economics, University of Michigan Press, 1997, p. 152.
Michele Graziadei & Ugo Mattei & Lionel D. Smith, Commercial Trusts in European Private Law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 88-91.
M. Lupoi, The Civil Law Trust, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 1999, vol. 32, p. 975.
Ulrich Drobnig, Transfer of Property, Arthur Hartkamp, Martijn Hesselink, Ewoud Hondius, Carla Joustra, Edgar du Perron, Muriel Veldman, Towards a European Civil Code, 2004, Kluwer Law International, pp. 737-741.
Id
D.J. Hayton & S.C.J.J. Kortmann & H.L.E. Verhagen, Principles of European Trust Law, 1999, p. 3.
Roger John Smith, Property Law: Cases and Materials, Pearson Longman Publishing, 2006, pp. 6-8.
D. Johnston, Trusts and Trust-like Devices in Roman Law, R. Helmholz & R. Zimmermann, Itinera iduciae: Trust and Treuhand in Historical Perspective, 1998, pp. 42-48.
Ugo Mattei, Comparative Law and Economics, University of Michigan Press, 1997, p. 153.
DCFR: Outline Edition, p. 8.
Eva-Maria Kieninger, Michele Graziadei, George L. Gretton, Security rights in movable property in European private Law, Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 652.
Christian von Bar & Ulrich Drobnig, The Interaction of Contract Law and Tort and Property Law in Europe: A Comparative Study, European Law Publishers, 2004, pp. 324-326.
L.P.W. van Vliet, Transfer of Movables in German, French, English and Dutch Law, Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri, 2000, p. 91.
Christian von Bar & Ulrich Drobnig, The Interaction of Contract Law and Tort and Property Law in Europe: A Comparative Study, European Law Publishers, 2004, pp. 320-321.
Id.
Caquelard c. Lemoine, 1834.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, A More Coherent European Contract Law, An Action Plan, COM (2003) 68 final.
Id, p. 15.


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 页 共[9]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章