【注释】 See Eleanor D. Kinney & Brain Alexander Clark, Provisions for Health and Health Care in the Constitutions of the Countries of the World, 37 Cornell Int’l L.J (2004).
对这一类型的
宪法条款，Eleanor D. Kinney & Brain Alexander Clark给出的例子是荷兰
宪法第
22条第2款的规定，即“政府应采取步骤促进全体居民的健康”。但本文认为，按Eleanor D. Kinney & Brain Alexander Clark的分类，荷兰
宪法的这一条款应当属于义务型规定。
Central Appeals Court, 12 December 1986.
本文关于健康权的
宪法事例主要来于《国际法上作为人权的健康权》一书。See BRIGIT C. A. TOEBES. The right to Health as a Human Right in International Law. Intersentia Antwerpen-Groningen-Oxford,1999.
Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity and others v. State of West Bengal and another.
Supreme Court, Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity and others v. State of West Bengal and another, A. I. R. 1996, SCC, P. 2426.
Thiajraj Sccbramcney V. Minister of Health.Constitutional Court of South Africa Thiajraj Sccbramcney V. Minister of Health, CCT 32/97. 27, November 1996.
Vikram Deo Singh Tomar v. State of Bihar, 1988, Supp. SCC. P. 234.
Central Appeals Court, 29 May 1996. NJB, 29, November 1996, No. 3, pp. 1826-1827.
President of the Rotterdam District Court, 19 January 1990, TvG, 1990, p. 53.
President the Hague District Court, 18 June 1987. TvG, No. 92, 1987. Gevers, 1994, p. 115.
Constitutional Court of Colombian, Judgement No. T-505 of 28 August 1992.
Constitutional Court of Colombian, Decision No. T-527 of 10 November 1993.
The National Ombudsman, 18 July 1995.
Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India, 1990(1) SCC, P. 613 (Bhopal Gas Disaster Case)
President the Amsterdam District Court, 11 August 1988 (Methadone Case), KG 88, 352.
Constitutional Court of Italy, 23 May 1994, 218/1994.
Constitutional Court of Italy, 21 February – 3 March 1994, Council of Europe, Bulletin on Constitutional Case Law 1994-1, Judgment No. 70, p. 35.
The Hague Appeals Court, 29 December 1988.
Supreme Court, 14 April 1989(Benckiser Case), M﹠R 1989, P. 258.
M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, 1987 (4) SCC, p. 463.
The Philippines Supreme Court Decision in Minors Oposa v. Secretary of the Department of Environmental and Natural Resources(DENR), 30 July 1993, 33 International Legal Materals 173(1994).
C. E. R. C. v. Union of India, 1995 (1), Scale 354, 1995(3) SCC, p. 42.
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India and Others, ICJ Review No. 36, June 1986, pp.69-72(A.I.R. 1984 SC 802)
C. E. S. C. Limited v. Subbash Chandra Bose, 1992(1)SCC, p. 441; A. 1992 SC 573, Decided on 15 November 1991.
Feldbrugge v. Netherland.Feldbrugge Case (Judgment of 27 February 1985, A. 99 1986)
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, 20 October 1993, U-III-336/1992, Narodne Novine, No. 102/1993.
Case of Lopez Ostra v. Spain(Judgment of 9 December 1994, A. 303C 1995)
Anna Guerra and 39 Others v. Italy (Application No. 14967/89), Judgment delivered on 19 February 1998.
Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa Country, 415 U.S. 250 (1974).
Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Murray v. Vandevander, Division No. 1,522 p.2d 302.
Supreme Court of New Jersey, Choose v. Byrne, 91 N.J. 287; 450 A.2d 925, 18 August 1982.
曲相霏：《国际法事例中的健康权保障》，载《学习与探索》2008年第2期。
BRIGIT C. A. TOEBES. The right to Health as a Human Right in International Law.pp.238—240. Intersentia Antwerpen-Groningen-Oxford,1999
曲相霏：《国际法事例中的健康权保障》，载《学习与探索》2008年第2期。
BRIGIT C. A. TOEBES. The right to Health as a Human Right in International Law. p.232. Intersentia Antwerpen-Groningen-Oxford,1999.
