|
E. Landes, “Economics of Alimony,” 7 Journal of Legal Studies 35 (1978).
W. Bischop, “Is He Married?: Marriage as Information,” 34 University of Toronto Law Journal 245 (1984).
E. Scott and R. Scott, “A Contract Theory of Marriage” in F. Buckley ed., The Fall and Rise of Freedom of Contract , Durham: Duke University Press, 1999.
M. Brinig and J. Carbone, “The Reliance Interest in Marriage and Divorce,” 62 Tulane Law Review 855 (1988), pp. , 857-70.
M. Minow, “Forming Underneath Everything that Grows: Toward a History of Family,” Wisconsin Law Review (1985),pp. 819.
C. Schneider, “Moral Discourse and the Transformation of American Family Law,” 83 Michigan Law Review(1985), pp. 1803.
Brinig & Carbone, 见注释5, 页859。
E. Shorter, The Making of the Modern Family , New York: Basic Books, 1975.
Courson v. Courson, 213 Md.183,188,129 A. 2d 917, 919 A. 2d 917, 919 (1957); Hyman v. Hyman AC 601 (HL).
Wadlington, “Sexual Relations After Separation or Divorce: The New Morality and the Old and New Divorce Laws,” 63 Virginia Law Review (1977), pp. 249.
Haskins v. Haskins, 188 Va 525, 50 S. E. ad 437 (1948).
Neuner, “Modern Divorce Law-The Compromise Solution.” 28 Iowa Law Review (1943), pp. 272, 276.
Stegall v. Stegall, 2 Brock 256, 22 F. Cas 1226 (C.C.Va. 1825) (No.13,351).
M. Trebilcock and R. Keshvani, “The Role of Private Ordering in Family Law: A Law and Economics Peerspective,” 41 University of Toronto Law Journal (1991), pp. 533, 538.
Law Reform Commission of Canada Report on Family Law (Hull, Que.: Supply and Services Canada, 1976) at 3.
Divorce Act 1985 RSC 1986, c.4 ss 8(1) and (2) (a).
W. Wadlington and R. O’brien, Domestic Relations ,New York: Foundation Press, 2002), pp. 293.
New York Domestic Relations Law, s 170 (5) and (6); California Family Code s 2310 (a); Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act, s 302 (a) (2).
K. Kenniston, All Our Children: The American Family Under Pressure , New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977, pp. 21.
Kempe v. Kempe, 1 Hag. Ecc. 532, 162 Eng. Rep. 668 (1828); Atkin, “Spousal Maintenance: A New Philosophy?” 9 New Zealand University Law Review (1981), pp. 336, 340.
Hyman v. Hyman AC 601, 614 (HL).
Hyman v. Hyman，同上，页 629 。
Law Reform Commission of Canada Report on Family Law, 见注释16，页35。
有关反对把家庭当成合伙学说的观点，参阅Ira Ellman, “The Theory of Alimony,” 77 California Law Review (1989), pp. 3.
Family Law Act 1986, SO 1986 c.4; Divorce Act 1985, RSC 1986 c.4.
Family Law Act, 同上注，第5条1款。
Family Law Act, 同上注，第5条6款。
Family Law Act, 同上注，第33条8款和9款。
Pelech v Pelech (1987) 7 REL (3d) 225, 271 (SCC).
Pelech v Pelech，同上注，页272。
同上。
New York Domestic Relations Law, s 236 (B) (1980); California Family Code, s. 4800 (West 1986).
同上。
California Family Code (West 2001), s 4320 (a).
同上。
California Family Code (West 2001), s 4320 (b) to (k); New York Domestic Relations Law (West 1999), s 236 (6).
Brinig and Carbone, 见注释5, 第860页；Trebilcock and Keshvani, 见注释15, 页545
P. Bromley, Family Law, 6th ed. , London: Butterwords, 1981, pp. 276.
L. Weitzman, The Divorce Regulation: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences of Divorce for Women and Children in North America , New York: Free Press,1985, pp. 233; M. Glendon, “Family Law Reform in the 1980’s,” 44 Louisiana Law Review (1984), pp. 1553-1585.
G. Becker, A Treatise on the Family , Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991), pp. 140.
Ontario Children’s Law Reform Act, RSO 1980 c.68 s 20 (1).
同上
Garska v McCoy, 167 W. Va 59, 278 S.E. 2d 359 (1981); California Family Code (West 1994), s 3040 (a)(1); Wisconsin Statutes (West Supp. 2000), s 787. 24 (2)(a) and (b).
|
