|
参见棚濑孝雄著，王亚新译：《纠纷的解决与审判制度》，中国政法大学出版社1994年版，第10页。
上揭棚濑孝雄书，第85－99页。
上揭棚濑孝雄书，第14—17页
See Laurence Boulle, ADR Applications in Administrative Law, Acta Juridical, 1993.
Fiss, Against Settlement, 93 Yale Law Journal, pp. 1073-1075.
Meyerson, Bruce E., ＆Cooper, Corinne ed., A Drafter’s Guide To Alternative Dispute Resolution, p4., America Bar Association.
参见注5揭，王锡锌文。
L. Ray, Emerging Options in Dispute Resolution, 75 A.B.A. JOURNAL 66 (June, 1989).
Joseph & Gilbert, Breaking the Settlement Ice: The Use of Settlement Judges in Administrative Proceedings, 3 ADMIN. L. J.571, 573 (1989-90).
Joseph & Gilbert, Breaking the Settlement Ice: The Use of Settlement Judges in Administrative Proceedings, 3 ADMIN. L. J.582-584 (1989-90).
Joseph & Gilbert, supra note at 585-86.
SeeErin Parkin Huss, Note: Response to the Experimental Role of Settlement Judges in Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings, 37 ARIZ. L. REV. 895 (1995).
See Davis and Omlie, mini-trial: The Courtroom in the Boardroom, 21 Willamette Law Review, pp. 531-532(1985).
See Alfred C. Aman and William T. Mayton, Administrative Law, West Group(1992), P.292.
See P Nonet ＆P Selznik Law and Society in Transition: Towards Responsive Law(1978).
See Laurence Boulle, ADR Applications in Administrative Law, Acta Juridical, 1993.
See Laurence Boulle, ADR Applications in Administrative Law, Acta Juridical, 1993.
参见【美】理查德．B.斯图尔特著：《美国行政法的重构》（沈岿译），商务印书馆2002年版，第1—2页。
参见季卫东：《社会变革的法律模式》，《转变中的法律与社会：迈向回应型的法》（诺内特 塞尔兹尼克著 张志铭译 中国政法大学出版社2004年版）一书的“代译序”。
“共存的正义”（Co-existential Justice）、“争吵的正义”（Contentious Justice）这一用语，参见M Cappelletti, Access to justices as a theoretical approach to law and a practical program for reform, (1992)109 SALJ34.
See R IMBROGNO, Using ADR to Address Issues of Public Concern: Can ADR Become an Instrument for Social Oppression?14 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol . 1998－1999.
|
