法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
婵炲娲栫欢銉︾┍閳╁啩绱� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╁棘娴煎瓨顦� | 婵℃鐗呯欢锟� | 缂侇喗鍎抽幖褔寮崶鈺冨娇 | 闁告帗鍨崇花銊モ枖閺囩偟浼� | 婵ɑ鍨崇花銊モ枖閺囩偟浼� | 缂備礁绻戠粊鐟扳枖閺囩偟浼� | 閻炴稑鏈弬鍌氣枖閺囩偟浼� | 閻犲洤顦抽鎾斥枖閺囩偟浼� | 闁告艾鐗勯埀顑藉亾闁靛棌鍋撻柛姘炬嫹 | 婵℃鐗呯欢銉у垝妤e啠鍋撻敓锟� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╁棘閸ワ箑濮� | 闁告艾鐗嗛幃鎾绘嚑閸愨晜鎷� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉ф暜濮濆瞼妲� | 闁告瑦鐡曢埀顒€鍟撮。鑺ユ償閿燂拷 | 
婵炲娲栫欢銉╁炊閸欍儱濮� | 閻犲洤顦抽鎾诲箰閸パ冪 | 閻㈩垰鎽滈弫銈呪枖閺団槅娼� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉р偓鍦仜婵拷 | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╂煂婵犱胶鐤� | 婵炲娲栫欢銉╂⒒椤斿墽鎽� | 婵炲娲濋~澶屾喆閿濆牜鍤� | 閻熶椒绀侀崹浠嬪棘閸ワ箑濮� | 閻庤浜濈涵鍓佺尵閿燂拷 | 婵ɑ鍨甸弲銏犫枖閺囩姾顫� | 閻炴稑鏈弬鍌氣枖閺囩姾顫� | 缂備礁绻戠粊鐟扳枖閺囩姾顫� | 闁告帗鍨剁涵鍓佺尵閿燂拷 | 缂佲偓閸欍儳绐楁繛澶嬫礈鐞氾拷 | 婵℃鐗呯欢銉ф惥鐎n亜鈼� | 闁靛棌鍋撻柕鍡忓亾闁靛棌鍋撻柕鍡忓亾
英国行政法上的听证(下)


R. v.Kensington and Chelsea Rent Tribunal, ex parte MacFarlane 1 WLR1486.

Barnardv. National Dock Labour Board 2 QB 18; Vine v. NationalDock Labour Board AC 488; Jeffs v. New Zealand Dairy Board 1 AC 551, at 568, 569; R. v. Race Relations Board, ex parteSelvarajan 1 WLR 1686.

ChiefConstable of the North Wales Police v. Evans 1 WLR 1155, at 1161,1165, per Lord Hailsham and Lord Bridge.

LocalGovernment Board v. Arlidge AC 120.

Lloydv. McMahon AC 625.

BrightonCorporation v. Parry 70 LGR 576.

分别参见R. v. Secretary ofState for the Home Department, ex parte Doody 1 AC 531; R. v.Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Duggan 3 AllER 277.

R. v.Army Board of the Defence Council, ex parte Anderson 1 QB 169.

R. v.Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Malhi 1 QB194.

R.(on the application of Smith) v. Parole Board 1 WLR 421 (CA); UKHL 1 (HL).

R. v.Army Board of the Defence Council, ex parte Anderson QB 169.

R. v.Kingston-upon-Hull Rent Tribunal, ex parte Black 65 TLR 209.

R. v. Housing Appeal Tribunal 3 KB 334; ReWilson AC 750.

相关讨论参见J. Alder, “Representationbefore Tribunals”, (1972) Public Law 278; D. Galligan, Due Process and FairProcudure (Oxford University Press, 1996), pp.361-369.

R. v.Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Tarrant QB251, at 285-286, per Webster.

分别参见R. v. Board ofVisitors of HM Remand Centre Risley, ex parte Draper, The Times, May 24,1988; R. v. Board of Visitors of Parkhurst Prison, ex parteNorney, The Times, July 29, 1989.

R. v.Leicester City Justices, ex parte Barrow 2 QB 260.

R. v.Canterbury of Archbishop, ex parte Morant KB 282, at 292.

R. v.Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech (No. 2) QB 198.目前,新的狱规规定,监狱管理人员不能拆看犯人与其律师的通信,不管该犯人是否处在诉讼过程;除非监狱长有理由相信该通信夹带违禁物品或者可能危害监狱和他人安全。

相关的案例,参见Campbell and Fell v.UK, ECHR Series A, no. 80.

EnderbyTown Football Club Ltd. v. Football Association Ltd. Ch. 591.

R. v.Board of Visitors of Hull Prison, ex parte St. Germain (No.2) 1WLR 1401.

R. v. Bradford JJ,. ex parte Wilkinson 1 WLR 692.

R. v.Hereford Magistrates Court, ex parte Rowlands QB 110.

Universityof Ceylon v. Fernando 1 WLR 223.

R. v.Commission for Racial Equality, ex parte Cottrell & Rothon 1WLR 1580.

R. v.Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, ex parte Guiness plc 1 QB 146.

Bradmanv. Radio Taxicabs Ltd. 134 New LJ 1018.

Herringv. Templeman 3 All ER 569.

R. v.Deputy Industrial Injuries Commissioner, ex parte Moore 1 QB 456,at 490, per Diplock LJ.

Erringtonv. Wilson, The Times, 2 June 1995.

Nicholsonv. Secretary of Sate for Energy (1978) 76 LGR 693.

R. v.Blundeston Prison Visitors, ex parte Fox-Taylor 1 All ER 646.

Bushellv. Secretary of State for the Environment AC 75. LordEdmund-Davies法官表示异议。他坚称,“传唤对方证人以供质证是自然正义的要求”。Ibid,at116.

R. v.London Regional Passengers Committee, ex parte Brent LBC, The Times, May23, 1985.

RePergamon Press Ltd. Ch. 388, at 400.

Hansonv. church Commissioners QB 823.

Ladd v.Marshall 1 WLR 1489. 另见Al-Mehdawi v. Home Secretary 1AC 876; HertfordshireInvestments Ltd v. Bubb 1 WLR 2318, 2325.

Bushellv. Secretary of State for the Environment AC 75, at 102, per LordDiplock. 法院同时指出,如果新的证据在案件的关键问题上有重要意义,部长应当重新组织调查,或者给相关当事人发表书面意见的机会。


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 页 共[10]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章




娉曞緥淇℃伅 | 娉曞緥鏂伴椈 | 妗堜緥 | 绮惧搧鏂囩珷 | 鍒戜簨娉曞緥 | 姘戜簨娉曞緥 | 缁忔祹娉曞緥 | 琛屾斂娉曞緥 | 璇夎娉曞緥 | 鍚堝悓 | 妗堜緥绮鹃€� | 娉曞緥鏂囦功 | 鍚堝悓鑼冩湰 | 娉曞緥甯歌瘑 | 
娉曞緥鍥句功 | 璇夎鎸囧崡 | 甯哥敤娉曡 | 娉曞緥瀹炲姟 | 娉曞緥閲婁箟 | 娉曞緥闂瓟 | 娉曡瑙h | 瑁佸垽鏂囦功 | 瀹硶绫� | 姘戝晢娉曠被 | 琛屾斂娉曠被 | 缁忔祹娉曠被 | 鍒戞硶绫� | 绀句細娉曠被 | 銆€銆€銆€銆€