法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵洪弽顐n偨闁靛濡囬埞宥夋煃閳轰礁鏆曠紒鎲嬫嫹 | 婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵洪弽顐n偨闁靛鏅涘Λ妯好归悡搴f憼妞わ讣鎷� | 婵犵鍓濋〃鍛存偋閸涱垱顐介柨鐕傛嫹 | 缂傚倷绶¢崰妤呭磿閹惰棄绠圭憸鏂款嚕椤掑嫬鐐婇柍鍝勫暙婵烇拷 | 闂備礁鎲$敮妤呭垂瀹曞洩濮抽柕濞垮劗閺嬫牠鏌¢崶鈺佷户濞寸》鎷� | 婵犳鍠楄摫闁搞劌纾懞閬嶅Ω閵夈垺鐏冮梺鍝勬川閸嬬喐瀵奸敓锟� | 缂傚倸鍊风粈浣烘崲閹寸姷鐭堥柣鐔稿閺嬫牠鏌¢崶鈺佷户濞寸》鎷� | 闂佽崵鍋炵粙鎴﹀嫉椤掑嫬妫橀柛灞惧焹閺嬫牠鏌¢崶鈺佷户濞寸》鎷� | 闂佽崵濮村ú銈壦囬幎绛嬫晩闁圭偓鏋奸弸鏍煛閸モ晛浠уù纭锋嫹 | 闂備礁鎲¢懝楣冩偋閸曨垰鐒垫い鎴f娴滈箖姊洪棃娑欘棏闁稿鎹囬弻娑橆潩閻愵剙顏� | 婵犵鍓濋〃鍛存偋閸涱垱顐介柕澹啫鐏婃俊銈忕到閸熺娀宕戦幘缁樻櫢闁跨噦鎷� | 婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵洪弽顐n偨闁靛鏅涘Λ姗€鏌涢妷顖滅暠濠殿噯鎷� | 闂備礁鎲¢懝楣冩偋閸℃稑绠栭柟鍓х帛閸ゆ垿鏌涢幇銊︽珕闁瑰嚖鎷� | 婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵洪弽顐n偨闁靛/鍕濠殿喗绻傞惉鐓幬i敓锟� | 闂備礁鎲¢悷锕傛偤閺囥垹鐒垫い鎺嗗亾闁哥喐鎸抽妴鍌炴嚍閵夛箑鍔呴梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 | 
婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵洪弽顐n偨闁靛鏅涢悙濠囨煕濞嗗秴鍔氬┑顕嗘嫹 | 闂佽崵濮村ú銈壦囬幎绛嬫晩闁规崘顕х粻浼存煕閵夋垵鍟伴、锟� | 闂佹眹鍩勯崹浼村箺濠婂牆鏋侀柕鍫濇噳閺嬫牠鏌¢崶锝嗩潑婵炵》鎷� | 婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵洪弽顐n偨闁靛/鈧崑鎾诲捶椤撶偘绮舵繝娈垮櫙閹凤拷 | 婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵洪弽顐n偨闁靛鏅滈悡鍌氣攽閻樿精鍏岄柣銈忔嫹 | 婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵洪弽顐n偨闁靛鏅滈埛鎺撱亜閺傚灝鈷旈柟鏂ゆ嫹 | 婵犵數鍋涢ˇ鏉棵哄┑瀣剁稏濠㈣泛鏈崰鍡涙煥濠靛棛澧遍柛銈忔嫹 | 闂佽崵鍠嶅鎺旂矆娓氣偓瀹曡绂掔€n亝顥濋梺鎼炲劵缁犳垶鎱ㄩ敓锟� | 闂佽姘﹂鏍ㄧ濠靛牊鍏滈柛鎾茶兌鐏忕敻鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 | 婵犳鍠楄摫闁搞劎鏁诲鏌ュ閻橆偅鐏冮梺鍝勬川婵箖锝為敓锟� | 闂佽崵鍋炵粙鎴﹀嫉椤掑嫬妫橀柛灞惧焹閺嬫牠鏌¢崶鈺佇い顐嫹 | 缂傚倸鍊风粈浣烘崲閹寸姷鐭堥柣鐔稿閺嬫牠鏌¢崶鈺佇い顐嫹 | 闂備礁鎲$敮妤呭垂閸撲焦鍏滈柛鎾茶兌鐏忕敻鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 | 缂傚倷璁查崑鎾绘煕濞嗗秴鍔ょ紒鎰殕缁绘稒寰勭€n偆顦柣鐐寸啲閹凤拷 | 婵犵鍓濋〃鍛存偋閸涱垱顐介柕澹嫭鍎遍柣搴秵娴滄粓鍩i敓锟� | 闂備線娼уΛ宀勫磻閹剧粯鐓忛柛鈥崇箰娴滈箖姊洪棃娑欘棏闁稿鎹囬弻鏇㈠幢韫囨挷澹�
英国行政法上的听证(下)


Glynn v.Keele University 1 WLR 487.

R. v.Hull University Visitor, ex parte Page AC 682.

ColegElidyr (Camphill Communities Wales) Ltd. v. Koeller and another EWCA Civ 856.

Schmidtv. Secretary of State for Home Affairs 2 Ch. 149.

Re H. K.(An Infant) 2 QB 617; Att-Gen of Hong Kong v. Ng Yuen Shiu 2 AC 629.

R. (onthe application of L) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 1 All ER 1062.

这些法律包括:1971年《移民法》(第2部分),1993年《避难和移民申诉法》,1996年《避难和移民法》,2002年《国籍、移民和避难法》。

R. v.Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Cheblak 1WLR 890.

Schmidtv. Secretary of State for Home Affairs 2 Ch. 149, at 168-170, per Lord Denning.

W.Hohfeld, “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Appliedin Judicial Reasoning”, (1913) 23Yale Law Journal 16. 相关评论参见王涌《寻找法律概念的“最小公分母”:霍菲尔德法律概念分析思想研究》,《比较法研究》1998年第2期 。

更为详细的中文文献,参见余凌云《行政法上合法预期之保护》,《中国社会科学》2003年第3期。

Councilof Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service AC 374.

loniluyi v. Secretary of State for the Home Department Imm AR 135.

R. v.Croydon Justices, ex parte Dean QB 769.

R. v.Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khan 1 WLR1337.

R. v.Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Ruddock 1WLR 1482.

HTVLtd. v. Price Commission ICR 170

R. v.Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Unilever STC 681

Cinnamondand Others v. British Airport Authority 1 WLR 582.

相关中文文献,可以参见万鄂湘主编《欧洲人权法院判例评述》,湖北人民出版社1999年,79-139页。

R. (onthe Application of Hamid Ali Husain) v. Asylum Support Adjudicator ACD 10.

RunaBegum v. Tower Hamlets London Borough Council 2 AC 430.

R (onthe application of Thompson) v. Law Society 2 All ER 113.

Townand County Planning Act 1990, s. 35 B (4).

Fraserv. State Services Commission 1 NZLR 116, at 122, 125; Binney v.Secretary of State for the Environment JPL 871.

Local Government Act 1972, s. 236 (asamended).

R. v.Secretary of State for Health, ex parte US Tobacco International Inc. QB 353.

ouncil of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service AC 374, at 402, per Lord Fraser. 另一位法官也强调,“行政机构应当拿出证据,而不能仅仅宣称‘事关国家安全’”。Ibid, at 421, per Lord Roskill.

Chahalv. UK 23 EHRR 413.

PlantHealth Act 1967, ss.3, 4 (as amended).

HighwayAct 1980, s. 258.

RoadTraffic Act 1988, ss. 69, 70, 72.

FoodSafety Act 1990, s. 9. 但销毁食品的决定只能由治安法官作出。

PublicHealth (Control of Disease) Act 1984, s.41; Public Health Act 1961, ss.17, 37. 但其它为防止传染病扩散的行政强制措施,仍应以事先告知为条件,例如拆除违章建筑、腾出害虫孳生的房屋等。

R. v.Halliday AC 260; Liversidge v. Anderson AC 206.

R. v.Powys CC, ex parte Horner Fam. Law 320.

R. v.Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Pegasus Holdings (London)Ltd. 1 WLR 990.

R. v.Life Assurance Unit Trust Regulatory Organisation, ex parte Ross QB 17.

PublicHealth (Control of Disease) Act 1984, s. 32, 35-36, 38, 48.

earlberg v. Varty 2 All ER 6.

DeSmith, Woolf & Jowell, Principles of Judicial Review (Sweet & Maxwell,1999), pp.379-386。

Wisemanv. Borneman AC 297, at 317-321, per Lord Wilberforce. 法院在该案中驳回了原告的请求。

RePergamon Press Ltd. Ch. 388.

Rees v.Crane 2 AC 173.

Planning(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, s.20. 但在实践中,行政机构通常会非正式地告知房主。

CustomsConsolidation Act 1876, s. 42; Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, s. 139,Sched. 3. 另见ObscenePublications Act 1959, s. 3 (3). 如果当事人提出异议,争议通过诉讼解决。


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 页 共[10]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章




濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夛妇鈹嶉柍鈺佸暕缁憋拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛妫樺ù鐓庣摠椤︼拷 | 濠碘剝顨呴悧鍛閿燂拷 | 缂備緡鍠楅崕鎶藉箹瑜斿顒勫炊閳哄啫濞� | 闂佸憡甯楅崹宕囪姳閵娿儮鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 濠殿喗蓱閸ㄥ磭鑺遍妸銉㈡灃闁哄洨鍋熸导锟� | 缂傚倷绀佺换鎴犵矈閻熸壋鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闁荤偞绋戦張顒勫棘閸屾埃鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闁荤姴娲らˇ鎶筋敊閹炬枼鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闂佸憡鑹鹃悧鍡涘箖閿燂拷 | 濠碘剝顨呴悧鍛閵壯冨灊濡わ絽鍟犻崑鎾绘晸閿燂拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛妫橀柛銉畱婵拷 | 闂佸憡鑹鹃悧鍡涘箖閹剧粯鍤戦柛鎰ㄦ櫆閹凤拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵壯勬殰婵繂鐬煎Σ锟� | 
濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛鐐婇柛娆嶅劚婵拷 | 闁荤姴娲らˇ鎶筋敊閹捐绠伴柛銉戝啰顢� | 闁汇埄鍨伴幗婊堝极閵堝應鏋栭柡鍥f濞硷拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵壯€鍋撻崷顓炰粶濠殿噯鎷� | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晜鐓傚┑鐘辫兌閻わ拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晜鈷掓い鏂垮⒔閹斤拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú婵嬶綖婢跺本鍠嗛柨婵嗙墱閸わ拷 | 闁荤喍妞掔粈渚€宕规禒瀣闁搞儻绠戞慨锟� | 闁诲氦顕栨禍婵堟兜閸撲胶灏甸柨鐕傛嫹 | 濠殿喗蓱閸ㄧ敻寮查姀鐘灃闁哄洨濮鹃~锟� | 闁荤偞绋戦張顒勫棘閸屾埃鏋栭柡鍥╁Ь椤拷 | 缂傚倷绀佺换鎴犵矈閻熸壋鏋栭柡鍥╁Ь椤拷 | 闂佸憡甯楅崹鍓佹兜閸撲胶灏甸柨鐕傛嫹 | 缂備讲鍋撻柛娆嶅劤缁愭绻涙径瀣閻炴熬鎷� | 闂侀潧妫岄崑鎾绘煏閸″繐浜鹃梺闈涙閸嬫捇鏌曢崱蹇撲壕