|
14.F v R (1983), 33 SASR, at p 196.
15.Ibid, at p 196
16.ra, Liability for Negligent WBarbaords, (1999) at112-124
17.Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee, [1957] 1 WLR 582, at p 586
18.Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital, [1985] AC 871, at p 893
19.Ibid, at p 894
20.Robertson, G, Informed consent to medical treatment,(1981) 97 LQR 102 at 115
21.Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee, [1957] 1 WLR 582
22.Roger v Whitaker (1992) CLR 479 at 483
23.Talina Drabsch , Medical Negligence: An update,2004
24.Roger v Whitaker (1992) CLR 479
25.Clark S, Tort reform take two,(2003), at 54
26.Roger v Whitaker (1992) CLR 479
27.Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee, [1957] 1 WLR 582
28.Bili;[1957] 2 All ER 118 (QBD).
29.Roger v Whitaker (1992) CLR 479 at 487
30.Ibid.
31. K.Shanmugam ,Testing the Bolam Test: Consequences of Recent Developments, at p1
32.CIVIL LIABILITY AMENDMENT (PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY) ACT 2002
33.Talina Drabsch , Medical Negligence: An update,2004,at p 6
34.Clark S, Tort reform take two,(2003), at 56
35.Ibid, at 57
36.Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 2 All ER 118
37.Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479
38.Ibid, at 486
39.Ibid
40.Talina Drabsch , Medical Negligence: An update,2004,at 2.
41. Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479
----------------------------------------------------------------
Reference:
1.Andrew Clarke, Negligence a Practical Learning Approach,(2003)
2.Barbara, Liability for Negligent Words, (1999)
3.Belinda Bennett, Law and Medicine,(1977)
4.Clark S, Tort reform take two, (2003)
5.CIVIL LIABILITY AMENDMENT (PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY) ACT 2002: (5 May2006)
|
