|
Gaia Bassani-Antivari v. IOC, CAS OG 02/003, paras 4.5 and 4.6., http: www.tas-cas.org, 2002-06-01; Troy Billington v. FIBT, CAS OG 02/005, paras 34 and 35, http: www.tas-cas.org, 2002-06-01.
Gaia Bassani-Antivari v. IOC, CAS OG 02/003, para 4.9, http: www.tas-cas.org, 2002-06-01.
Schaatsefabriek Viking B.V v. German Speed-Skating Association (Viking), Nagano Winter Olympic Games, 1998. See Richard H. McLaren, Introducing the Court of Arbitration for Sport: The Ad Hoc Division at the Olympic Games, 12 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 515, 524 (Fall 2001).
Richard Mclaren, A New Order: Athletes’ Rights and the Court of Arbitration at the Olympic Games, 6 Olympika 1, 4 (1998).
See CAS Arbitration Rules for the Olympic Games (14/12/03), http://www.tas-cas.org/en/code/frmco.htm, 2004-02-10.
See Gabrielle Kaufmann – Kohler, ibid. at 43—45. See also CAS Arbitration Rules for the Olympic Games (14/12/03), http://www.tas-cas.org/en/code/frmco.htm, 2004-02-10; Arbitration also Rules for the Games of the XXVII Olympiad in Sydney, ibid., at 118—113; Rules for the resolution of Disputes Arising during the XVIII Olympic Winter Games in Nagano, in Matthieu Reeb (ed.), Digest of CAS Awards 1986-1998, Switzerland: Editions Stæmpfli SA, 1998, at 653—660; and CAS Arbitration Rules for the Olympic Games (14/12/03), http://www.tas-cas.org/en/code/frmco.htm, 2004-02-10.
参见 R. v. IOC, arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Nagano 1998) 002, in Matthieu Reeb (ed.), Digest of CAS Awards 1986-1998, Switzerland: Editions Stæmpfli SA, 1998, at 419-425. 该争议仲裁过程如下：热巴哥利体在滑雪项目中获得了金牌，但随后因为查出服用了大麻而被剥夺了金牌。他辩解道是因为被动呼入其朋友吸食的大麻而呈阳性的。需要指出的是国际滑联的规范规定允许运动员体内含有较小部分的大麻，而另一方面国际奥委会完全禁止使用大麻。最后仲裁庭裁定国际奥委会没有收回其金牌的权力。
See art. 18, CAS Arbitration Rules for the Olympic Games (14/12/03), http://www.tas-cas.org/en/code/frmco.htm, 2004-02-10.
See art. 9 (a), ibid.
See arts. 11-15, ibid.
See COA and Beckie Scott v. IOC, TAS 2002/O/373, paras. 1—7, http: //www.tas-cas.org/en/juris/frmjur.htm, 2003-12-24.
参见韩德培主编：《国际私法》，高等教育出版社、北京大学出版社2000年版，第130至131页。
See COA and Beckie Scott v. IOC, TAS 2002/O/373, paras. 45-46, http: http://www.tas-cas.org/en/juris/frmjur.htm, 2003-12-24.
See Art. 17, Arbitration Rules for the Olympic Games, http://www.tas-cas.org/en/code/frmco.htm, 2003-12-23.
Gabrielle Kaufmann – Kohler, Arbitration at the Olympics: Issues of fast-track disputes resolution and sports law, The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International, 2001, at100.
Michael J. Beloff, Tim kerr, & Marie Demerriou, Sports Law, Orford – Protland Oregon: Hart Publishing, 1999, at 262.
从国际法的角度来讲，一般法律原则指的是各国法律体系中所包含的共同的原则。在国际体育运动领域内，它不但指公法上的一些原则，也包含私法以及程序法的某些共同适用的原则。
See Staatsfabriek Viking BV v. German Speed Skating Association, CAS, NAG3. 转引自Michael J. Beloff, Tim kerr, & Marie Demerriou, Sports Law, Orford – Protland Oregon: Hart Publishing, 1999, at 9.
Michael J. Beloff, Drugs, Laws and Versapaks, in John O’Leary(ed.), Drugs and Doping in Sport: Social-Legal Perspectives, London/Sydney: Cavendishing Publishing Limited, 2001, at 56.
M. v. AIBA, arbitration CAS ad hoc division (O.G. Atlanta 1996)006, in Matthieu Reeb (ed.), Digest of CAS Awards 1986-1998, Berne: Editions Stæmpfli SA, 1998, at 414-415, paras. 9-11.
See Michael J. Beloff, Tim kerr, Marie Demerriou, Sports Law, Orford – Protland Oregon: Hart Publishing, 1999, at 9-12.
Gabrielle Kaufmann – Kohler, Arbitration at the Olympics: Issues of fast-track disputes resolution and sports law, The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International, 2001, at 100.
Gabrielle Kaufmann – Kohler, Arbitration at the Olympics: Issues of fast-track disputes resolution and sports law, The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International, 2001, at 100—101.
COC et Jesus Kibunde c/ AIBA, arbitrage Chambre ad hoc du TAS (J.O. Sydney 2000) 004, sentence rendue le 18 septembre, 2000, in Matthieu Reeb (ed.), CAS Decisions—Sydney 2000: The Decisions by the Ad Hoc Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport During the 2ooo Games in Sydney, Lausanne, ICAS, 2000, at 48—49, para.11; NWBA v.IPC, arbitration CAS 95/122, in Matthieu Reeb (ed.), Digest of CAS Awards 1986-1998, Switzerland: Editions Stæmpfli SA, 1998, at184, para.36.
NZOC v. SLOC, arbitration CAS ad hoc Division(OG Salt Lake City) 02/006, para.4.9, http: www.tas-cas.org/en/juris/frmjur.htm, 2002-07-01.
肖永平：《国际私法原理》，法律出版社2003年版，第463页。
赵秀文：《国际商事仲裁及其适用法律研究》，北京大学出版社2002年版，第96页。
(1997) Bulletin ASA, at 316/329-330.
Edward H. Jurith, etc., Regulations Governing Drugs and Performance Enhancers in Sports, 12 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L. J. 337, 379 (Winter, 2002).
|
