法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夛妇鈹嶉柍鈺佸暕缁憋拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛妫樺ù鐓庣摠椤︼拷 | 濠碘剝顨呴悧鍛閿燂拷 | 缂備緡鍠楅崕鎶藉箹瑜斿顒勫炊閳哄啫濞� | 闂佸憡甯楅崹宕囪姳閵娿儮鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 濠殿喗蓱閸ㄥ磭鑺遍妸銉㈡灃闁哄洨鍋熸导锟� | 缂傚倷绀佺换鎴犵矈閻熸壋鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闁荤偞绋戦張顒勫棘閸屾埃鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闁荤姴娲らˇ鎶筋敊閹炬枼鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闂佸憡鑹鹃悧鍕焵椤戣棄浜鹃梺闈涙閸嬫捇鏌涘鐐 | 濠碘剝顨呴悧鍛閵壯冨灊濡わ絽鍟犻崑鎾绘晸閿燂拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛妫橀柛銉畱婵拷 | 闂佸憡鑹鹃悧鍡涘箖閹剧粯鍤戦柛鎰ㄦ櫆閹凤拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵壯勬殰婵繂鐬煎Σ锟� | 闂佸憡鐟﹂悺鏇㈠焵椤掆偓閸熸挳銆傞懞銉﹀劅闁跨噦鎷� | 
濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛鐐婇柛娆嶅劚婵拷 | 闁荤姴娲らˇ鎶筋敊閹捐绠伴柛銉戝啰顢� | 闁汇埄鍨伴幗婊堝极閵堝應鏋栭柡鍥f濞硷拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵壯€鍋撻崷顓炰粶濠殿噯鎷� | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晜鐓傚┑鐘辫兌閻わ拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晜鈷掓い鏂垮⒔閹斤拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú婵嬶綖婢跺本鍠嗛柨婵嗙墱閸わ拷 | 闁荤喍妞掔粈渚€宕规禒瀣闁搞儻绠戞慨锟� | 闁诲氦顕栨禍婵堟兜閸撲胶灏甸柨鐕傛嫹 | 濠殿喗蓱閸ㄧ敻寮查姀鐘灃闁哄洨濮鹃~锟� | 闁荤偞绋戦張顒勫棘閸屾埃鏋栭柡鍥╁Ь椤拷 | 缂傚倷绀佺换鎴犵矈閻熸壋鏋栭柡鍥╁Ь椤拷 | 闂佸憡甯楅崹鍓佹兜閸撲胶灏甸柨鐕傛嫹 | 缂備讲鍋撻柛娆嶅劤缁愭绻涙径瀣閻炴熬鎷� | 濠碘剝顨呴悧鍛閵壯勬儱閻庯綆浜滈埣锟� | 闂侀潧妫岄崑鎾绘煏閸″繐浜鹃梺闈涙閸嬫捇鏌曢崱蹇撲壕
公共执法的经济学理论


  Garoupa, Nuno. 1997. The Theory of Optimal Law Enforcement, J. Econ. Surveys, 11, pp. 267-95.

  Grossman, Gene M. and Michael L. Katz. 1983. Plea Bargaining and Social Welfare, Amer. Econ. Rev., 73, pp. 749-57.

  Kahneman, Daniel; Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge U. Press.

  Kaplow, Louis. 1990a. Optimal Deterrence, Uninformed Individuals, and Acquiring Information About Whether Acts are Subject to Sanctions, J. Law Econ. Organ., 6, pp. 93-128.

  --. 1990b. A Note on the Optimal Use of Nonmonetary Sanctions, J. Public Econ., 42, pp. 245-47.

  --. 1992. The Optimal Probability and Magnitude of Fines for Acts That Definitely Are Undesirable, Int. Rev. Law Econ., 12, pp. 3-11.

  Kaplow, Louis and Steven Shavell. 1994a. Accuracy in the Determination of Liability, J. Law Econ., 37, pp. 1-15.

  --. 1994b. Optimal Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting of Behavior, J. Polit. Econ., 102, pp. 583-606.

  Kenkel, Donald S. 1993. Do Drunk Drivers Pay Their Way? A Note on Optimal Penalties for Drunk Driving, J. Health Econ., 12, pp. 137-49.

  Kessler, Daniel P. and Steven D. Levitt. 1999. Using Sentence Enhancements to Distinguish between Deterrence and Incapacitation, J. Law Econ., forthcoming.

  Kobayashi, Bruce H. and John R. Lott, Jr. 1992. Low-Probability-High-Penalty Enforcement Strategies and the Efficient Operation of the Plea-Bargaining System, Int. Rev. Law Econ., 12, pp. 69-77.

  Kornhauser, Lewis A. 1982. An Economic Analysis of the Choice Between Enterprise and Personal Liability for Accidents, California Law Rev., 70, pp. 1345-92.

  Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Jean Tirole. 1993. The Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Landes, William M. 1971. An Economic Analysis of the Courts, J. Law Econ., 4, pp. 61-107.

  Landes, William M. and Richard A. Posner. 1975. The Private Enforcement of Law, J. Legal Stud., 4, pp. 1-46.

  Levitt, Steven D. 1996. The Effect of Prison Population Size on Crime Rates: Evidence from Prison Overcrowding Litigation, Quart. J. Econ., 111, pp. 319-51.

  --. 1998. Why Do Increased Arrest Rates Appear to Reduce Crime: Deterrence, Incapacitation, or Measurement Error? Econ. Inq., 36, pp. 353-72.

  Lewin, Jeff L. and William N. Trumbull. 1990. The Social Value of Crime? Int. Rev. Law Econ., 10, pp. 271-.

  McAdams, Richard H. 1997. The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms, Michigan Law Rev., 96, pp. 338-433.

  Malik, Arun S. 1990. Avoidance, Screening and Optimum Enforcement, RAND J. Econ., 21, pp. 341-53.

  --. 1993. Self-Reporting and the Design of Policies for Regulating Stochastic Pollution, J. Environmental Econ. and Management, 24, pp. 241-57.

  Miceli, Thomas J. 1996. Plea Bargaining and Deterrence: An Institutional Approach, European J. Law Econ., 3, pp. 249-64.

  Montesquieu, 1748. The Spirit of the Laws. Rept. ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977 (originally published 1748)

  Mookherjee, Dilip. 1997. The Economics of Enforcement, in Issues in Economic Theory and Policy, Essays in Honor of Tapas Majumdar. Eds. Amitava Bose, Mihir Rakshit and Anup Sinha. New Delhi: Oxford U. Press, pp. 202-49.

  Mookherjee, Dilip and I. P. L. Png. 1992. Monitoring vis-à-vis Investigation in Enforcement of Law, Amer. Econ. Rev., 82, pp. 556-65.

  --. 1994. Marginal Deterrence in Enforcement of Law, J. Polit. Econ., 102, pp. 1039-66.

  --. 1995. Corruptible Law Enforcers: How Should They Be Compensated? Econ. J., 105, pp. 145-59.

  Newman, Harry A. and David W. Wright. 1990. Strict Liability in a Principal-Agent Model, Int. Rev. Law Econ., 10, pp. 219-31.

  Png, I. P. L. 1986. Optimal Subsidies and Damages in the Presence of Judicial Error, Int. Rev. Law Econ., 6, pp. 101-105.

  Polinsky, A. Mitchell. 1980a. Private versus Public Enforcement of Fines, J. Legal Stud., 9, pp. 105-27.

  --. 1980b. Strict Liability vs. Negligence in a Market Setting, Amer. Econ. Rev.:Papers and Proceedings, 70, pp. 363-70.

  Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 1988. The Deterrent Effects of Settlements and Trials, Int. Rev. Law Econ., 8, pp. 109-16.

  --. 1989. A Note on Optimal Public Enforcement with Settlements and Litigation Costs, Res. Law Econ., 12, pp. 1-8.

  --. 1991. A Model of Optimal Fines for Repeat Offenders, J. Public Econ., 46, pp. 291-306.

  Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Steven Shavell. 1979. The Optimal Tradeoff between the Probability and Magnitude of Fines, Amer. Econ. Rev., 69, pp. 880-91.

  --. 1984. The Optimal Use of Fines and Imprisonment, J. Public Econ., 24, pp. 89-99.

  --. 1991. A Note on Optimal Fines When Wealth Varies Among Individuals, Amer. Econ. Rev., 81, pp. 618-21.

  --. 1992. Enforcement Costs and the Optimal Magnitude and Probability of Fines, J. Law Econ., 35, pp. 133-48.

  --. 1993. Should Employees Be Subject to Fines and Imprisonment Given the Existence of Corporate Liability? Int. Rev. Law Econ., 13, pp. 239-57.

  --. 1998a. On Offense History and the Theory of Deterrence, Int. Rev. Law Econ., 18, pp. 305-24.

  --. 1998b. The Fairness of Sanctions: Some Implications for Optimal Enforcement Policy. Working Paper No. 167, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics, Stanford Law School.

  --. 1999a. On the Disutility and Discounting of Imprisonment and the Theory of Deterrence, J. Legal Stud., 28, pp. 1-16.


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 页 共[10]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章




濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夛妇鈹嶉柍鈺佸暕缁憋拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛妫樺ù鐓庣摠椤︼拷 | 濠碘剝顨呴悧鍛閿燂拷 | 缂備緡鍠楅崕鎶藉箹瑜斿顒勫炊閳哄啫濞� | 闂佸憡甯楅崹宕囪姳閵娿儮鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 濠殿喗蓱閸ㄥ磭鑺遍妸銉㈡灃闁哄洨鍋熸导锟� | 缂傚倷绀佺换鎴犵矈閻熸壋鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闁荤偞绋戦張顒勫棘閸屾埃鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闁荤姴娲らˇ鎶筋敊閹炬枼鏋栭柡鍥╁仧娴硷拷 | 闂佸憡鑹鹃悧鍡涘箖閿燂拷 | 濠碘剝顨呴悧鍛閵壯冨灊濡わ絽鍟犻崑鎾绘晸閿燂拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛妫橀柛銉畱婵拷 | 闂佸憡鑹鹃悧鍡涘箖閹剧粯鍤戦柛鎰ㄦ櫆閹凤拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵壯勬殰婵繂鐬煎Σ锟� | 
濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晛鐐婇柛娆嶅劚婵拷 | 闁荤姴娲らˇ鎶筋敊閹捐绠伴柛銉戝啰顢� | 闁汇埄鍨伴幗婊堝极閵堝應鏋栭柡鍥f濞硷拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵壯€鍋撻崷顓炰粶濠殿噯鎷� | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晜鐓傚┑鐘辫兌閻わ拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú鏍閵夆晜鈷掓い鏂垮⒔閹斤拷 | 濠电偛顦板ú婵嬶綖婢跺本鍠嗛柨婵嗙墱閸わ拷 | 闁荤喍妞掔粈渚€宕规禒瀣闁搞儻绠戞慨锟� | 闁诲氦顕栨禍婵堟兜閸撲胶灏甸柨鐕傛嫹 | 濠殿喗蓱閸ㄧ敻寮查姀鐘灃闁哄洨濮鹃~锟� | 闁荤偞绋戦張顒勫棘閸屾埃鏋栭柡鍥╁Ь椤拷 | 缂傚倷绀佺换鎴犵矈閻熸壋鏋栭柡鍥╁Ь椤拷 | 闂佸憡甯楅崹鍓佹兜閸撲胶灏甸柨鐕傛嫹 | 缂備讲鍋撻柛娆嶅劤缁愭绻涙径瀣閻炴熬鎷� | 闂侀潧妫岄崑鎾绘煏閸″繐浜鹃梺闈涙閸嬫捇鏌曢崱蹇撲壕