Ridge v. Baldwin AC 40.
Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food AC 997.
Anisminic Ltd. v. Foreign Compensation Commission and Another AC 223 (QB); 2 QB 862 (CA); 2 AC 147 (HL).
W. Wade, “Constitutional and Administrative Aspects of the Anisminic Case” (1969) Law Quarterly Review 198.
W. Wade, ibid. Also see De Smith, “Judicial Review in Administrative Law: The Ever-Open Door?” (1969) Cambridge Law Journal 161.
关于直接适用原则，参见Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen ECR 1, 26/62。关于优先适用原则，参见Costa v. ENEL CMLR 425, 6/64; Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v. Simmenthal Spa (no.2) 3 CMLR 263, 106/77。
Lord Diplock, “The Common Market and the Common Law” (1972) Law Teacher 8.
Felixstowe Dock and Railway Co. v. British Transport and Docks Board 2 CMLR 655, at 659.
Macarthys Ltd. v. Smith QB 180. 相关评论参见，T. Allan, “Parliamentary Sovereignty: Lord Denning’s Dexterous Revolution” (1983) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22.
Garland v. British Rail Engineering Ltd. 2 AC 751, at 771.
Duke v. GEC Reliance Ltd. AC 618; Webb v. EMO 2 All ER 43.
EC Commission v. UK, C-246/89R ECR 3125.
R. v. Secretary of State for Transports, ex parte Factortame Ltd. (no.2) 1 AC 603.
R. v. Secretary of State for Transports, ex parte Factortame Ltd. (no.5) 1 AC 524.
Ian Loveland, Constitutional Law: A Critical Introduction (2nd, Butterworths, 2000), p.387.
W. Wade, “What has Happened to the Sovereignty of Parliament?” (1991) Law Quarterly Review 1, and “Sovereignty: Revolution or Evolution?” (1996) Law Quarterly Review 568. Also see, John EEkelaar, “The Death of Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Comment” (1997) Law Quarterly Review 185.
R. v. Secretary of State for Employment, ex parte Equal Opportunities Commission 1 AC 1.
D. Nicol, “Disapplying with Relish? The Industrial Tribunals and Acts of Parliament” (1996) Public Law 579.
W. Wade, “Sovereignty: Revolution or Evolution?” (1996) Law Quarterly Review 568, at 574.
Murray Hunt, Using Human Rights Law in English Courts (Hart Publishing, 1997), especially chapters 4-6.
R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind AC 696. 该案中，内政部长根据1981年广播法和英国广播公司(BBC)章程，指令BBC不得播放北爱尔兰分裂组织代表的讲话。数名记者起诉，认为内政部长的指令侵犯了《欧洲人权公约》保护的言论自由。英国法院驳回了原告的诉讼请求。
例如，East African Asians v. The United Kingdom 3 EHRR 76; Golder v. The United Kingdom 1 EHRR 524; The Sunday Times v. The United Kingdom 2 EHRR 245.
Anthony Lester, Democracy and Individual Rights (Fabian Tract, no. 390, 1968).
关于人权法制定过程，参见Robert Blackburn, Towards a Constitutional Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom: Commentary and Documents (Printer Publisher Ltd., 1999).
John Griffith, “The Political Constitution” (1979) Modern Law Review 1.
Michael O’Brien, HC Deb, vol. 306, col. 855 (16 February 1998).
R. v. A (no.2) 1 AC 45.
Lord Irvine, “The Impact of the Human Rights Act: Parliament, the Courts and the Executive” (2003) Public Law 308, at 320.
Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza UKHL 30.
ibid, para 32 (per Lord Nicholls).
参见英国政府
宪法事务部网站http://www.humanrights.gov.uk/decihm.htm。另有几个宣告抵触的判决被上级法院推翻。
R. (H) v. Mental Health Review Tribunal (North and East London Region) 3 WLR 512; The Mental Health Act (Remedial) Order 2001, SI 2001/3712.
