|
Oral Pleadings (Port.), (May 11, 1999), at CR 99/21.
Oral Pleadings (Port.), (May 11, 1999), at CR 99/21.
Oral Pleadings (U.S.), (May 11,1999), at CR 99/24. para.1.8.
Oral Pleadings (Fr.), (May 11, 1999), at CR 99/17.
Oral Pleadings (Spain), (May 11, 1999), at CR 99/22.
Oral Pleadings (Italy), (May 11,1999), at CR 99/19.
Oral Pleadings (U.K.), (May 12,1999), at CR 99/34.
Oral Pleadings (F.R.G.), (May 11,1999), at CR 99/18.
Oral Pleadings (Belg.), (May 10, 1999), at CR 99/15.
Oral Pleadings (Belg.), (May 10, 1999), at CR 99/15.
Oral Pleadings (Belg.), (May 10, 1999), at CR 99/15.
参见美国总统克林顿就北约空袭行动发表的全国电视讲话。该讲话载于高秋福主编：《硝烟未散—科索沃战争与世界格局》，新华出版社，1999年8月，页375-380。
除15名国际法院的法官外，南联盟根据《国际法院规约》第31条选派了一名特设法官，因此，该案共16名法官。投反对票的法官是：法院副院长Weeramantry、史久镛法官、Vereshchetin法官 和特设法官Kreca。
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), para.51.
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium)。
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium)，dissenting opinion of Judge ad hocKreca, para.20.
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium)，dissenting opinion of Judge ad hocKreca, para.21.
Aaron Schwabach, Yugoslavia v. Nato, Security Council Resolution 1244, and theLaw of Humanitarian Intervention, 27 Syracuse Journal of International Lawand Commerce, Winter, 2000, p.96.
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium)，dissenting opinion of Judge ad hocKreca, para.21.
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), para. 15.
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), Declaration of Judge Koroma.
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), dissenting opinion ofVice-President Weeramantry.
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), dissenting opinion ofVice-President Weeramantry. The section entitled “The Position of the Applicant”
ICJ: Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), dissenting opinion ofVice-President Weeramantry. The section entitled “The Position of the Applicant”.
参见陈治世著：《国际法院》，台湾商务印书馆，1983年，页146。
该决议见联合国文件: U.N.Doc.S/RES/1244 (June10,1999)。
见Louis Henkin, Kosovo and the Law of“Humanitarian Intervention”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.93,No.4, October 1999, p.827. 相同意见还可参见Aaron Schwabach, Yugoslavia v. NATO, Security Council Resolution1244, and the Law of Humanitarian Intervention, 27 Syracuse Journal ofInternational Law and Commerce, Winter, 2000, pp.83-84.
|
