法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
法律信息 | 法律新闻 | 案例 | 精品文章 | 刑事法律 | 民事法律 | 经济法律 | 行政法律 | 诉讼法律 | 合  同 | 案例精选 | 法律文书 | 合同范本 | 法律常识 | 司考题库 | 
法律图书 | 诉讼指南 | 常用法规 | 法律实务 | 法律释义 | 法律问答 | 法规解读 | 裁判文书 | 宪法类 | 民商法类 | 行政法类 | 经济法类 | 刑法类 | 社会法类 | 案例趋势 |     
Taking Dworkin Seriously

 
 
 
 And I also hesitate to say that foreigners must not have “actual wisdom” to provide applicable plans.Human societies are as similar as they are different.Foreign civilizations may accumulate relatively abundant experiences in certain areas, which can be applied to other societies.And foreigners may also be able to understand the situations of other cultures by many means.It is not impossible that certain foreign projects, under certain circumstances, might be even more workable than certain domestic ones.Native ignorance is not a rare phenomenon.Furthermore, even if not applicable as a whole, a foreign lesson may still be, at least partially, inspiring and educational.Accordingly, we may listen to the foreign voices carefully before we come to our conclusion.This position seems to be more reasonable than unexceptionally assuming foreign opinions to be lacking in “actual wisdom”.
 
 
 
 Certainly, foreign theories must be localized according to specific domestic situations.However, the dogmatization of Marxism is not Marx’s fault.The accompanying disasters also cannot justify requiring Marx to shut up.“Do not blame your food because you have a bad appetite.”
     If outsiders provide a bad suggestion and then insiders accept, it is the insiders, not the outsiders, that should be blamed and be responsible for any tragic result.
 
 
 
 The key point lies in the free speech and personal sovereignty arguments.Everyone, even the outsider, has a right to express his or her opinions.It is the insiders’ responsibility to deliberately consider all the suggestions and make final decisions.
 
 
 
 To be sure, “no one can make decision for others.”(Fang, 2002)But I did not believe that Professor Dworkin had such a decision-making power.He did nothing that overstepped his privilege to free speech.What he did were only to attend several workshops and express his views.I cannot possibly imagine that Dworkin intended to put a gun to a Chinese guy and force the latter to run the risks that he would not run.


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] 页 共[8]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章




法律信息 | 法律新闻 | 案例 | 精品文章 | 刑事法律 | 民事法律 | 经济法律 | 行政法律 | 诉讼法律 | 合同 | 案例精选 | 法律文书 | 合同范本 | 法律常识 | 
法律图书 | 诉讼指南 | 常用法规 | 法律实务 | 法律释义 | 法律问答 | 法规解读 | 裁判文书 | 宪法类 | 民商法类 | 行政法类 | 经济法类 | 刑法类 | 社会法类 |